The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The moral case for harm reduction > Comments

The moral case for harm reduction : Comments

By Sam Ben-Meir, published 17/4/2026

Is addiction a disease to cure or a life to preserve? The answer shapes whether we choose abstinence or harm reduction.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
Addicts are responsible for their own problems. Addiction is not a disease, it is a weakness. There is no need for alcohol or hard drugs and, of course, total abstinence is the only safe way.

Alcohol is the most dangerous drug because it is socially acceptable, and heavily advertised. The often heard ‘need for a stiff drink’ recognises the mood changing properties of the drug. There is no safe level of alcohol consumption. Nobody taking a drink for the first time knows whether or not he or she will be “social drinker” or what is called an alcoholic, a fancy word for an addict, as addicted to the stuff as any heroin addict. “Harm reduction” is ridiculous. Addictioncannot be managed.

Addictions cost the West billions, plus the unnecessary deaths of the addicts themselves and their victims (of crime and road fatalities).

Only addicts can deal with their problems. The ones who can't need to be isolated from society. They are just too dangerous to everyone else.
Posted by ttbn, Friday, 17 April 2026 9:15:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy