The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Key government infrastructure investments are ending up as super-expensive white elephants > Comments

Key government infrastructure investments are ending up as super-expensive white elephants : Comments

By Brendan O'Reilly, published 19/3/2026

If these projects made sense, politicians would invest their own money. Instead, taxpayers are left footing the bill.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Indy,

Aged Welfare was introduced federally in Australia in 1909. On today's value that's trillions of dollars, and nothing to show for it, a whole herd of white elephants, agree? We could have built a super fast rail line around Australia, twice over, for what it has cost. AND at the same given well deserved tax relief to those long suffering landlords, with a bit of negative/negative gearing!
Posted by Paul1405, Friday, 20 March 2026 9:33:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n7ebIRxJrU
Paul1405,
imagine what infrastructure could be built for the money spent on this ? Puts us old age pensioners to shame !
Posted by Indyvidual, Friday, 20 March 2026 4:06:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What made me cringe with the Sydney to Newcastle fast train proposal was the expectation of generating about $500 million in fares annually for the $90 billion cost of the project.
Posted by Fester, Friday, 20 March 2026 6:15:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Fester,

"What made me (Fester) cringe with the Sydney to Newcastle fast train proposal was the expectation of generating about $500 million in fares annually for the $90 billion cost of the project."

I think the missing word there is "SERVICE" the idea of government provided services to improve peoples lives. Last year Australia spent around $59 billion on military expenditure, but I can't see one cent in revenue, does that also make you CRINGE? I won't even mention the cost of Aged Welfare, and how much revenue that generates!

Conservatives always believe any juicy plum the government owns, like a bank, shipping line, insurance company, telco etc should be sold off for song to the Big End Of Town, leaving government to operate the mill-stones around their necks education, health, military, welfare etc. Then they can whinge about how bad and inefficient government enterprise is.
Posted by Paul1405, Friday, 20 March 2026 8:06:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Paul,

You couldn't be more wrong. The VFT is like a monorail: An ego boosting toy for the elites to admire, of little or no benefit to most people, that takes away funding from essentials like health, education and roads.
Posted by Fester, Saturday, 21 March 2026 6:11:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Fester,

I disagree, I support the notion of 'Bullet Trains', time is money. For example the train from Brisbane to Sydney takes a ridiculous 14.5 hours, even Sydney to Newcastle takes 2.25 hours to cover a distance of about 170km, the same time as a steam train took in 1960!

You like to refer to the success of other countries, like nuclear power in France, was something you believed justified nuclear power in Australia. Japan introduced high speed 'Bullet Trains' in 1964, what a success that has been, the last steam train ran to Newcastle in 1970!

You were in agreement with Dud Dutton, that Australia should spend $600 billion of taxpayer money on nuclear power plants that would produce less than 4% of power needed in 25 years time. Did you support that brain fart because it came from your side of politics?
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 21 March 2026 1:12:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy