The Forum > Article Comments > Bondi Massacre aftermath > Comments
Bondi Massacre aftermath : Comments
By Howard Dewhirst, published 2/2/2026After Bondi, Scott Morrison challenges Islam’s leaders to police extremism. AFIC says no. What does that mean for Australia’s social contract?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All


Once you say "Islam caused Bondi," you've abandoned individual responsibility in favour of collective guilt. At that point, no amount of condemnation, cooperation, or reform by Muslim organisations could ever be sufficient, because the problem has been defined as their existence, not specific conduct.
That's not a security argument. It's a civilisational one.
If the test is whether a religion produces violent extremists, then consistency demands we apply it to all religions and political movements. There's no shortage of examples of this throughout history. If the test is whether institutions actively enable or conceal violence, then only evidence matters. Identity alone tells us squat.
Liberal democracies are built on a simple principle: people are judged by what they do, not by what they are assumed to believe. Abandon that, and you don't end up safer. Quite the opposite, in fact, because now you've just normalised suspicion as policy.
It's possible to confront Islamist extremism without dissolving the distinction between criminals and communities, you know. The moment we start doing that, the social contract everyone here claims to care about is already gone.