The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Whatever happened to 'Keeping the bastards honest'? > Comments

Whatever happened to 'Keeping the bastards honest'? : Comments

By John Mikkelsen, published 5/1/2026

Bondi, Anika Wells, and a Prime Minister caught misstating the facts. When Albanese spins, why does the press gallery look away?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
Hi Mikko2

They did use the term 'Never Again' in relation to the Holocaust.
I even quoted where Holocaust survivors said it themselves in relation to Gaza in an earlier comment.

Nevermind, I looked it up myself anyway, that's what computers are for, right.
http://holocaustremembrance.com/news/combating-antisemitism-never-again-association

"Maybe you are part of the delusional mob who think the real Holocaust never happened and it was some zionist plot to attack poor Hitler... That makes just as much sense as claiming the Jews had a holocaust against Palestine!"

I don't think it never happened, there's no debating whether Hitler had animosity towards Jews, and horrible things were done to them.
But I don't know for sure whether 6 million died, that's a lot.
A quarter of our entire nations population, I don't know if there we're that many Jews is Europe. I question whether the poor state of the camps was because supply lines were cut and the people were starving to death and whether or not Zyklon B was used to treat typhus, but beyond that I don't know I wasn't there.

'zionist plot to attack poor Hitler'
Well I did hear that England saw the rise of Nazi Germany as a threat to their dominance, but I was always pretty sure it was Hitler who invaded.
Makes me curious now, I wonder if it was similar to Putin invading Ukraine
(Putin was provoked)

"claiming the Jews had a holocaust against Palestine!"
- No, that's valid, do they all need to be dead to accept it?

"it's not worth wasting time debating anyone irrational enough to state things like..."

Yeah well that's the old story isn't it?
First you try to label me names and discredit me.
You don't want to debate me, but YOU called ME OUT, right?
Now what, you've got to run me down a little more when you realise I really am factual as best I can be and your trying to save face by saying 'he's not worthy of debate'

Whatever floats your boat mate.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 8 January 2026 3:37:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Cont.]
According to the IHRA working definition of Anti-Semitism, it'll be unlawful for me to question Jewish control the media.
Exhibit 1 (all I need)
Is Netanyahu not openly stating that they NEED control of media?
http://x.com/GenXGirl1994/status/1971741475638534655
But I'll add this.
http://x.com/Uncommonsince76/status/1835196803110556124

It'll also be unlawful for me to question whether a Jew is more loyal to our country than Israel.

Australian defence force officer stripped of security clearance over loyalty to Israel
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/feb/24/australian-defence-force-officer-stripped-of-security-clearance-over-loyalty-to-israel-ntwnfb

Now, would that fired ADF officer even been permitted to be accused of loyal to to Israel in the first instance with this law in place, and isn't questioning a persons loyalty to Australia (in the above context) a matter or national security?

Why should I be prevented from questioning a persons loyalty if they are potentially deemed to be inappropriate to serve in the ADF in any capacity?

Why should I be prevented from speaking the truth?

Former High Court justice in frame to lead Bondi royal commission
http://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/former-high-court-justice-in-frame-to-lead-bondi-royal-commission-20260107-p5nsfm.html

"The potential appointment of Virginia Bell has been flagged by senior Labor figures in recent days and has already prompted pushback from some Jewish leaders in NSW, Bell’s home state, over their belief she might be too left-leaning, a claim the government and Bell’s backers in the legal fraternity will challenge..."

Seems they're trying to put their finger on the scale.
It's not hard to ask 'Where does this person sit on the Palestine / Gaza war issue, are they a Christian?'

The issue of Bondi, should firstly be about the perpetrators motives.

The question of Anti-Semitism should not impinge on peoples right to speak truth, especially when the outcome Jews seek is surveillance and censorship.

It's a disgrace asking when it's a little vague whether criticism of Israel is Anti-Semitsm, during an ICJ determined genocide.

http://x.com/AdameMedia/status/1989826778005979239
President of the World Jewish Congress calls for new censorship laws in U.S schools.
He says “antisemitism” is thinking that “Jews control the government and the media.”
To prove they dont, he wants to control the government and the media…

So much for the constitution.
Just wait for Stargate.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 8 January 2026 3:45:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I'm reminded of an old Buddy Holly hit titled 'Rave On". 'Nuff said ..... you know who.
Posted by Mikko2, Friday, 9 January 2026 12:30:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy