The Forum > Article Comments > The Great Barrier Reef keeps on living > Comments
The Great Barrier Reef keeps on living : Comments
By John Mikkelsen, published 12/8/2025'Cruising over plate corals and staghorns on a manta board, I saw a reef alive with colour and life.'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
But let’s be clear: you’ve just sprinted away from the actual point. This started with your claim that Ridd’s GWPF report was peer-reviewed. You admitted it wasn’t. Everything since has been noise and deflection.
“The Reef is fine.”
That’s exactly why Ridd’s ideas don’t survive peer review. The peer-reviewed literature documents repeated mass bleaching, major declines in coral cover, and stress from rising seas. Resilience isn’t immunity.
“No climate emergency.”
Tell that to insurers, defence planners, or the Bureau of Meteorology. None of them are “woke,” but all are reacting to escalating risks and costs.
“Cold winter, so no warming.”
You're confusing weather and climate. A Granite Belt cold snap doesn’t erase global heat records, just like one rainy day doesn’t mean droughts don’t exist.
“CO2 isn’t the cause, more coal please.”
Every national science academy says otherwise. And while you point to China and India’s coal, you omit that they’re also leading in renewables - inconvenient for your “reality” list.
“They changed global warming to climate change.”
False. Both terms have been used for decades: global warming for the long-term heat trend, climate change for the broader shifts. Not a conspiracy, just scope.
King Canute. He showed his followers humans can’t command nature. Which makes it ironic when you argue we can pump out endless emissions with no consequences.
So here’s the real bait-and-switch: you started with a false claim about peer review, got caught, and are now burying the thread in talking points hoping no one notices. But the record’s clear: the report wasn’t peer-reviewed.
No pile of weather anecdotes or Canute stories changes that.