The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Directive to Iran: retaliation bad; de-escalation good > Comments

Directive to Iran: retaliation bad; de-escalation good : Comments

By Binoy Kampmark, published 24/6/2025

De-escalation has become one of those coarse words in severe need of banishment, best kept in an index used by unredeemable hypocrites.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
Wars are not won with the faint glowing embers of wishful thinking, but with aggressive flames of fury. Congratulations to Uncle Donald and Bro Bibi.

A curse on Muslim terrorism aimed unmistakably against our own Countries in the West, and from within our own Countries, all too often, and to those Leftists, (not excluding the U.N.) that support and excuse Muslim terrorism with their own cowardice and submission to its obvious subversive and destructive ambitions, and inevitable drastic outcomes for the majority that care for peace and good order at home, those with a focus on who is the real, and at times vague enemy.
Posted by diver dan, Tuesday, 24 June 2025 10:12:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Two words worse than descalation used here by the author: ‘international law’. Blabbing them out now are the biggest abusers of international law, including Russia and Communist China. China breaks everyone in the book.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 24 June 2025 12:04:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If the international law bureaucracy cannot or will not prevent Iran from attacking Israel through its proxies in Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, but then rules Israel’s subsequent attacks on Iran as illegal, then the law is both ineffective and wrong.

Iran is known to be concentrating uranium to levels far greater than is needed for energy production in heavily defended underground bunkers. The only possible reason to do this is to produce nuclear weapons. It is Israel’s sworn enemy and has vowed its destruction. If international law does not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, and rules Israel’s attempts to do so as illegal, then the law is both ineffective and wrong.

Israel does not have the bunker-busting weapons that might be able to prevent Iran from further concentrating uranium, but its ally the USA does. A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to Israel and the entire Middle East, and intends to impose an Islamofascist agenda on the entire region. If international law does not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, and rules the USA’s attempts to do so as illegal, then the law is both ineffective and wrong.
Posted by Rhian, Tuesday, 24 June 2025 6:31:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy