"If they exist,"

Of coarse they exist. You said so yourself when you declared that they'd been found to not "stand scrutiny".

You see, JD, you've been hoist on your own verb petard. You declared that the papers didn't stand scrutiny so that you could win a point, (or SEEM to win it) and have now spent a week trying to find a way to pretend otherwise.

Good fun, eh?

mhaze,

No - pointing out that claims like the ones you allude to have been thoroughly debunked before isn’t the same as admitting you’ve produced them now.

You haven't. You still haven’t.

And pretending this is all a debate about my wording, rather than your refusal to provide a single source for your own claim, only highlights it.

You said you had “dozens of papers.” You were asked - repeatedly - to post them. You didn’t. That’s the whole story.

All this noise is just covering the silence where your evidence should be.