Alan B.
Are Freeman Dyson, Ian Plimer, Gerlich & Tscheuschner high enough up for you?

RAS,
The biggest & worst pollutant is the stupidity of those who have no concept of daily life.

Indyvidual
What point are you trying to make? Please respond in Australian English and without flaming me.
Thanks

RAS,
Nothing aimed at you, only at those who have no concept of everyday working life.

The pro renewable crowd hasn’t as yet put up a list of any raw material that can be renewed without a carbon footprint. I for one am extremely interested as to what is a sustainable for perpetual reuse material.

Interesting opinions lacking any scientific support?

Suppose one cannot expect more from the Atlas or Koch Network linked US fossil fuel Heartland Institute (as is AIP, IPA, CIS etc.), sentimental agitprop versus reality?

FT 'Opinion Data Points: Economics may take us to net zero all on its own. The plummeting cost of low-carbon energy has already allowed many countries to decouple economic growth from emissions.

JOHN BURN-MURDOCH

In 2009, coal was still an attractive option for countries looking for affordable energy, its average costs coming in well below renewables. But by 2020, both wind and solar had become far cheaper per unit of energy. In some markets, capital-intensive new installations even worked out cheaper than existing coal plants.'

https://www.ft.com/content/967e1d77-8d3c-4256-9339-6ea7025cd5d3