Post-truth mhaze,

Firstly go read the article for once. The author was the one who raised the Jurassic period not me so it is entirely relevant to the discussion.

As to your paper are we really going to do the 'earth is cooling since 1998' dance you tried on years ago? What a cockup that turned out to be.

The paper you are quoting concludes: "However, for the four seasons, only the spring 20-yr box windowed cooling was statistically significant at the confidence level of p < 0.05."
http://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/104/6/BAMS-D-22-0153.1.xml#fig1 (see referencing really isn't that hard).

So one season, in an area which has been warming at twice the global rate, has a significantly significant cooling period and you are all cock and hoop?

Get a life.

Perhaps if the tin lids were better educated and not brainwashed by green advocates, they might realize that coal fired power is powering inflation, destroying our manufacturing sector and our economy.

That the only viable choice for a prosperous future and economy, is nuclear as either SMRs or MSR thorium or MSR nuclear waste burners burning nuclear waste others pay us annual millions to take of their hands.

It's a no brainer that the latter s walk away safe and reduces the half-life of the waste to 4-300 years instead of thousands as now.

It's their future these ideologically motivated air heads are trying to f#ck! And should be condemned in the strongest possible terms as the ignorant brainwashing imbeciles they most assuredly are!?
Alan B.

Standard SR in one post.

First he makes up stories about me using 1998 as a crux year. I can show multiple posts where I specifically abjured using the date. But with SR, the truth runs a distant second.

Then he claims that my posts on the previous hiatus were a cock-up. I can show numerous threads where I had to educate SR on the causes and actuality of the millennial hiatus. But with SR, the truth runs a distant second.

What the hell, here's an example of SR's historic cluelessness on this.... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=17749#314301

Meanwhile, last year's Nobel Physics prize winner, Dr. John Clauser has come out against the idiotic notion that there is a climate emergency. “There is no climate crisis! … Much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is not in peril.”

Why is he so wilfully ignorant of what happened 187Ma?

"Get a life."

I have a life. An infinitesimally small fraction of it is having fun pointing out your idiocies.

It's also a trait of the new climate change religion zealots such as the minority here, that they resort to personal slurs while trying to justify their beliefs that we really are facing a climate catastrophe and current dire warnings are more legitimate than those of decades past. The only thing that changes is the goal posts which get moved further out whenever a forecast tragedy fails to eventuate. Of course "climate change" is real, it's been happening since before the dinosaurs ruled the Earth and it always will happen despite any puny attempts to limit the tiny amount of a trace gas that is essential to all life on the planet. And BTW, as former chief scientist Alan Finkel admitted some years ago, if Australia cut it's tiny contribution (about 1.2% of the global total) immediately, it would have negligible effect on world climate.

Newly elected Argentine President, Javier Milei, has called climate change a "socialist hoax". Fifty six percent of Argentinians agree with him - possibly many more who voted for other people for different reasons. Fewer and fewer people these days bother themselves with the natural process of climate change. It's well down on the list of Australian's concerns in any polls you look at.

Is indoctrination irreversable ?