The Forum > Article Comments > Brittany Higgins prosecutor bites the dust > Comments
Brittany Higgins prosecutor bites the dust : Comments
By Bettina Arndt, published 7/8/2023Sensational conclusions from the ACT inquiry are good news for Bruce Lehrmann.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
I agree Sofronoff should not have given embargoed copies of his report to journalists, whatever his motives.
The ACT government was legally entitled to not release the report for up to a month, but given the intense public interest in the case, and its importance, it had no reasonable basis to keep it secret for that long, as many commentators observed at the time:
https://citynews.com.au/2023/no-reasonable-reason-to-delay-sofronoff-inquiry-findings/
It must surely also have realised that there was a risk of such a report leaking to the media. I am still inclined to believe The Australian’s claim that it received a copy of the report from a source other than Sofronoff, and only then published its findings.
The Inquiry did as it was obliged to do and gave affected parties copies of possible adverse findings in advance of publication, and sought submissions on them. So while Drumgold may not have seen the final report before it was published, its contents would hardly have been a surprise.