The Forum > Article Comments > Ben Roberts-Smith: the breaking of a plaster saint > Comments
Ben Roberts-Smith: the breaking of a plaster saint : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 2/6/2023The net effect of the claims proven to be substantially and contextually true meant that the unproven statements had done little to inflict overall damage upon the soldier's reputation.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by Canem Malum, Friday, 9 June 2023 7:08:37 AM
| |
CM,
That is a general observation by me, you don't need to worry which side I'm on, I'm always on the side of PEACE. As for you, are you also a MILITARIST itching for a war with China, like the American military-industrial complex are determined to have. Just as a side, it was the American President Dwight D Eisenhower who in 1961 warned the world, and his fellow Americans, of the dangers of the American military-industrial complex. Eisenhower didn't strike me as a "lefty radical", rather conservative I thought, but he was alarmed by that dangerous warmongering mob within America. My question to you is; Do you consider Eisenhower was a COMMUNIST, maybe a wolf in sheep's clothing? You are fond on calling out communists at every opportunity, what about Ike! Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 10 June 2023 12:18:13 PM
| |
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-warns-of-military-industrial-complex
Yes I've previously talked about Hebrew- Edward Bernays "Consumer Industrial Complex"- and how it has distorted US society according to commentators such as the BBC's Adam Curtis- in a sense the military industrial complex is a component. But I think that perhaps Paul1405 needs to read again what Eisenhower actually said. Perhaps Eisenhower is implying that sometimes enemies use false flags (the Russian's are coming) for distraction- rather than being aware of the real issue- citizens losing control of their own civilization. That doesn't mean that the Russian's aren't a danger and they may even be the biggest danger- but they aren't the only danger- and they won't always be the biggest danger. Perhaps he was implying that the revolution of Consumer Culture that Bernays created was/is an insidious danger and still is today. Others also commented on the dangers of cultural trends in the US- Yuri Bezmenov, Solzenytzn, Dostoevsky, James Burnham, others- even Hebrew Father of the New Left- Herbert Marcuse said that society was the sickness that was the cause of individual psychological diagnoses- perhaps he was trying to sew doubt as to what the Hebrew cultural position really is on Hebrew/ Anglo US/ Western relations. Bernays like his uncle Sigmund seem to think of US mass population as something that needed to be controlled under the illusion of democracy. It's helpful sometimes to keep the competition guessing. Posted by Canem Malum, Friday, 16 June 2023 2:50:43 AM
| |
What if Bernays was the greatest Russian agent they never had? A fascinating thought.
Posted by Canem Malum, Friday, 16 June 2023 2:58:45 AM
| |
Oh CM, so "fascinating", I'm fascinated to my boot straps. What if Fred Flintstone was a fascist, would you still be fascinated? BTW, is a fascinated person a fascists?
Posted by Paul1405, Friday, 16 June 2023 6:54:31 AM
|
One sides WAR HERO is the other sides WAR CRIMINAL.
Answer-
I've long suspected that Paul1405 was on the other side- now he admits it