Doctors tend to prefer scientific evidence over conspiracy theories. Formal trials showed little or no difference to taking ivermectin at various stages of Covid
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9215332/
However ivermectin is great for worming horses.

Just about everything the government, advised by unelected 'experts', did cost lives and ruined the economy. Only a Royal Commission will reveal the truth and pave the way towards justice against the thugs.

I am sure if you suffered worms, or your horse did, you'd be fine to use it. This is a particularly stupid article because you'd not be prescribed Asprin if you had worms, that does't mean it's a conspiracy or Government over reach, it just means it's useless.

Government overreach was banning Asutrainas from returning by deliberately limiting quarrantne facilities. Over reach was closing borders and not using better granualr data for lockdowns like LGA boundaries. An example, I could not step across the road from one state to another on the Gold Coast but I was free to drive to Mt Isa from the Gold Coast.

Did the ivermectin ban cost lives? It's a neigh from me.

"Doctors tend to prefer scientific evidence over conspiracy theories."

Oh I think there are quite a number of trials and studies which show the efficacy of ivermectin, I even read an article showing some of those trials. Now where did I see that?

Oh yeah...I remember. It was in the article attached to this post.

Sheeeeesh. None so blind as those who will not see.

Personal stories aren't evidence and are barely anecdote. Still....

During Covid my wife was immuno-compromised due to chemo for cancer. So I was extremely diligent in not exposing her to any chances of getting the WuFlu. Come 2022 and we had a massively important family event and decided to take the risk with all due precautions - booster shots, masks, making sure all other attendees had been tested within a few days of the event. Still the virus got through and all15 attendees came down with it to varying degrees.

All except one.

A few weeks prior, while attending my then dying father in his nursing home, I caught scabies which was rife at the time. Unpleasant but medication soon had it under control. I was still under that medication at the above event and I didn't get the virus - one out of 15.

The medication? Ivermectin.

Medication is produced for the masses not for individuals so, if something doesn't work for one it'll still work for many ! Stiff $hit for the one !

Possibly. But that outcome has never been a primary concern for big pharma, who jettison most products when their patent expires. And many generic examples hit the pharmaceutical shelves.

Alternatively, protect medications that may have nasty side effects or do nothing real but generate but huge or significant profit. Went tropo when 2 Aussie researchers proved stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and in so doing, killed big pharma's most profitable antacid sales.

Now statins are the most profitable but come with a degree of cognitive impairment. other older remedies are better but are out of patent, so as before, get the flick or the physicians prescribing hounded out of practise or medicine. And it's clear they own a number of, I believe, bought and paid for pollies.
Alan B.

When the Indian province of Uttar Pradesh population 220,000,000, yes two hundred & twenty million, had a major outbreak of covid they handed out Ziverdo kits free to every infected person, & to all associates of infected persons. It stopped the pandemic dead in it's tracks. How much real world proof does it take to get through to the dills?

Ziverdo Kit is an anti-infective medicine. It contains a combination of three components Doxycycline, Ivermectin and elemental zinc.The Ivermectin & zinc to stop the covid infection & the antibiotic to treat any associated infections. This stopped the thing dead in a very crowded environment.

Obviously the only people who don't recognise the use of Invermectin in the treatment of Covid are making a quid out of it, or scoring browny points somewhere.

I obtained my Ziverdo kits & Ivermectin from India at rather exorbitant prices, where they cost very little, thanks government. I haven't needed them, but have used the kits for a couple of friends, one of whom was in the middle of heavy cancer treatment with virtually no immune system left. Did they help, who knows, but both quickly cleared the infection.

None of my family including all the kids are jabbed, & none have contracted Covid. Surely this proves the effectiveness of Ivermectin, when just having it in the cupboard prevents infection. That is what's called a joke, information for the thick on the site.

Did the ivermectin ban cost lives?
- Of course it did.You know it, I know it, but as for the rest of the people living in La-la land who knows.

"Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" Lol
- The pharmaceutical industry cares about healthy patients in the same way the military industrial complex cares about world peace.

Did the ivermectin ban cost lives?

Perhaps, but really not likely at all.

However the cult it has produced most certainly has.

For those unfamiliar with the term "herxing" please brace yourselves.

http://twitter.com/cscnme/status/1632596248300494848?t=OYhOIWAmPBti_pCGLXTy3Q&s=19

12,000 followers. You signed up yet Hasbeen?

He doesn't have any followers anymore SteeleRedux
Looks like the guy in your tweet died a week ago.

http://twitter.com/PhuckYourVax/status/1632481554890117121

R.I.P. Danny

Those who spend their lives regurgitating the talking points their elites provide them continue with the meme that Ivermectin was used solely for horses.

That that isn't even close to true is beside the point for these 'thinkers'. Nonetheless Ivermectin has been prescribed for humans for around a decade (yes long before the dreaded WuFlu was released) and continues to be so prescribed. The dosage I received was indeed given in accordance with long established practice.

Meanwhile for those who fancy themselves followers of the science....

http://c19ivm.org/

A quote from one of those studies..."Data is data, regardless of your beliefs.” More than few people here will find that statement very confusing.

There are non so stupid as those who refuse to see plain evidence. With our SR, if it's not in the lefty hymn book it can't be seen.

Another really big problem is the corporate media.
- Their job is to mislead, misinform or persuade the general public.

Without the backing of the corporate media they could never have gotten away with this single covid related issue..
- The bigger question that must be asked is 'how many other things have they been manipulating the public with?'