The Forum > Article Comments > Labor should steer clear of negative gearing in its quest to raise taxes > Comments
Labor should steer clear of negative gearing in its quest to raise taxes : Comments
By Graham Young, published 13/3/2023While the treasurer has now ruled out imposing a capital gains tax (CGT), he has been silent on another area that Labor has traditionally targeted for adjustment—negative gearing.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Tax lurks and perks are invariably only suited to the top end wealthy, as is negative gearing on investment properties. 50% of the negative gearing advantage goes to this group, who are, interestingly, living in LNP electorates. 6% advantages the bottom 20% of households.
Negative gearing adds 4% to the cost of housing.
What would immediately assist with the housingm crisis would be a 10% tax on capital gains redirected to renters as government rent assistance.
A tax on single/couple occupancy of family suitable housing, discouraging underutilisation of the existing housing stock.
A second advantage of this innovation would be to reduce costs of replacement building stock to economic size suitable for single/couple occupancy