The Forum > Article Comments > The Uluru Statement isn't how we will close the gap > Comments
The Uluru Statement isn't how we will close the gap : Comments
By Anthony Dillon, published 16/6/2022One of the most common criticisms of the Uluru Statement is that its proposed parliamentary voice will somehow demonstrate two different laws, and some even say apartheid. I think this is a gross exaggeration.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The present ploy is to appeal to the sons and daughters of the well off who today are so enamoured of the new fashion of virtue signaling. Today, it is just so trendy to despise your own country, people, and culture, and instead pretend to be the protectors of the "oppressed."
So we get all of these sugary "statements" from "aboriginal" people who have already learned that identifying with one race in Australia can get you massive benefits. One of the latest, is to "close the gap" which never closes. What this means, of course, is that the good old Aussie taxpayer should shovel even more money at the Aboriginal Grievance Industry so that the self appointed 'aboriginal" leaders can get even richer.
And you can bet that every trendy lefty will be holding their hearts and thinking how virtuous they are supporting all of those poor aborigines living in self imposed squalor in their apartheid areas where people of other races may not tread.