Oh dear, ANSTO and the Kimba dump enthusiasts are in trouble. They were quite comfortable with the objections made by environmentalists and those pesky indigenous people. But this article is a problem, Not only does it come from a writer who is not even an anti-nuclear activist, but quite likely is actually pro nuclear.

The second problem is that he dares to actually mention the flooding, from a practical and understandable safety and geographical point of view - it is hard to dismiss his clear argument.

I did enjoy Taswegians comment about Kimba ''not getting much rainfall
, and ''not being near the sea'. Typical of the inanity of the pro nuclear comments that trivialise this otherwise serious journal.