Banjo, please stop fantasising.
You're starting to worry some here on OLO.
How you can even begin to take a "manchild" and TRY to sell him as some kind of public enemy number one, is beyond even the most imaginative playwriters reach.
I have previously given a fair and balanced description of trump and his psyche, and nowhere in all this was any evidence of a an evil, murderess, conniving man, quite the opposite in fact.
I have described him as a petulant child, a show off, an extremely proud man.
He did not enter politics to become POTUS, he did it to stick it up Obummer and other the "children" who bullied and picked on him in the playground.
He wanted to prove something, and he did, in grand fashion too.
I have never given a thought to his personality flaws, as they only showed us that he was a "normal, healthy, male", unlike the filth and evil snake oil salesmen before him, and now, after him.
You and anyone attacking him because of his personality and character flaws, are yourselves guilty of extreme prejudice and bias.
You are all being too emotional and narrow minded.
All previous POTUS's were much worse than Trump, only they hid it well and only exposed and put on their virtuous and saintly act to win over (con) the sheeple into believing they were honest, God fearing individuals, "just like them".
It's a shame that history is mostly based on LIES!

Just a quick follow-on.
This guy explains it exactly as I have done and believes in the same reasoning as I do.
I bookmarked him, because he echoed me so very closely, all you have to do is super-impose me instead of him, and that would be me in my own pod-cast, saying exactly what he is saying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej-Da4RiITQ

Dear mhaze and shadowminister,

Thank you for the correction as it illustrates my point even further. It was 10 Republican members of the House who voted to indict Trump and 7 members of the Senate voting to convict thus making it I believe the most bipartisan impeachment on record.

How does this help your case?

SR, you seem to gloat in quoting the obvious.
There is a word for that, but I won't say for fear of you running off to report me, as it seems by now, you are quite expert at.
I'm sure there are a few other OLOéns who would be very pleased to know this little known fact.
But please do continue to be picky and petty highlighting, inane or simple human errors.
Or is it that you are one of the adjudicators on OLO?
Because you have ALWAYS acted as one.

SR,

Then it was a bipartisan acquittal falling far short of a conviction.

Dear shadowminister,

Or rather a bipartisan majority who vote for a conviction.