Obviously both the government & the vaccine manufacturers know damn well that there has been way too short a time for adequate testing, or for any nasty side effects to be found.

Equally the manufacturers would not release their unproven vaccines with out the indemnification, it is too risky for any business model to do so.

Without a vaccine we have to either, let the virus rip & kill a lot of people, or continue with lock downs, destroy the economy, & destroy the lives of probably a whole lot more people, or use Hydroxychloroquine. Faced with an obvious catastrophe either way the government is gambling that the vaccine will do more good than harm.

Do be sure to drop us a line, if you survive Alan, it will help with the evaluation.

Mr 0,
>None of us here think it is coming out of Soot Morrison's pocket.
Correct. ScoMo isn't Australia. Equating government money with his pocket is tantamount to accusing him of corruption!

>The issue under discussion is whether or not the vaccine suppliers should be
>indemnified against any adverse health impacts on those being inoculated.
That's half the issue. The other half is how it should be funded if the first half is answered in the affirmative. John wants a user levy; I consider that to be stupid! Considering the public health benefits, I don't think the users should bear any of the cost.

We are told it is safe Why the need for an indemnity policy They really must think we are all stupid. This is a live virus It has been rushed through and allowed to circumvent normal scientific rigour It is an absolute disgrace that this is being foisted on people They have no idea of its efficacy and its long term impact on people at all Not only that but the origin of the non ethical vaccines are hideous They have used cell lines from babies who were aborted and don't believe the lie that it is a far distant link To create the cell line requires the baby's heart to be still beating for optimum chance of the cell line to be viable No good will come from these unethical vaccines Worst of all there has been a deliberate stifling of all other doctor views that have suggested there are other viable treatments for Covid and there is no need for this world wide experimental gamble being carried out Look to see who gains? Big Pharma and Big Tech and antidemocratic governance.

I heard a rumor that in the vaccine rollout to frontline workers overseas 14 health workers died after receiving the vaccine shot.

Well, I guess that justifies having to indemnify the vaccine suppliers.

I'm sure we have all heard by now of reports coming through that small numbers of people overseas have died after receiving the vaccine.

Soot Morrison has just spoken to Norway's PM re about 14 people dying from the jab of Pfizer.

Apparently there's nothing to worry about because these people were old and sick and were only expected to live for another couple weeks anyway.

WAIT A MINUTE!

If they only had a couple of weeks to live then why were they given the vaccine when the vaccine has to been given twice at a one month interval to be effective?

That means they would be dead before the second jab was ready.

Oh, I get it! The second jab was to bring them back to life.