The Forum > Article Comments > Australia can’t afford to bite its tongue on China > Comments
Australia can’t afford to bite its tongue on China : Comments
By John Lee, published 11/12/2020Beijing seeks to punish Australia for daring to make sovereign decisions and warding off others from trying to do the same.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Page 24
- 25
-
- All
"Most fundamental was the sense of frustration with the long, drawn-out war with China. The war was draining national resources and it was not resulting in any tangible benefits...The Japanese fascination and even obsession with the idea of distancing themselves from the Anglo-Saxon nations and identifying with Germany or the Soviet Union was an emotional response to the frustration of a long war, and had little to do with a specific programme for solidarity with revisionist forces in the world (Akira Irie, The Origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific, Longman, 1989, pp. 84-5.)"
Irie's book is an excellent treatise of Japan, dealing with it in broad, multinational context. But it has a flaw, and what the flaw is is well suggested by the title, Origins. It does not deal with the dis-origins and non-origins; that is, it was not a straight line from the Marco Polo Bridge to Pearl Harbor. There had always been in Japan strong forces and opinions opposing the hawks.
In passing Irie is astute and keen enough to observe that "Thus from the very beginning China identified itself with international law and order and sought its salvation through the support of other nations and world public opinion. A country which, throughout most of the 1920s, had been divided, unstable, and revolutionary, challenging the existing order of international affairs, was almost overnight transforming itself into a champion of peace and order, pitting itself against another which hitherto had been solidly incorporated into the established system but which could now be accused of having defied it (p. 11.)"
To be continued