The Forum > Article Comments > A conversation about bushfires, climate change, traditional knowledge and western science > Comments
A conversation about bushfires, climate change, traditional knowledge and western science : Comments
By Vic Jurskis, published 1/6/2020So-called western science, promulgated by acclaimed experts such as Bowman and Bradstock, doesn't have the answers because it's based neither on experience, nor on the scientific method.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
First, there needs to be an area of completely cleared land around the domicile. An engine-powered, ride-on brush cutting razor the minimum!
The domicile cannot be built with timber or any other flammable material, there should be a 2 metre high colourbond fence and the supporting framework, concrete and steel.
Houses should come with steel frames and metal roller doors mounted just under eves.so as to exclude any ember storm.
The yard, front back and sides, need to have popup sprinklers and the roof needs several to ensure wetting during any fire overwhelming period.
One notes that 445 folks died of smoke inhalation during our last firestorm season!
And there needs to be at least two million litres of reserve water storage to support such amenity that can disappear at the rate of 5,000 litres an hour! hemp and limestone bricks are not just fireproof but have thermal qualities that make life more tolerable during heat waves and the coldest winter night
There needs to be a buried shipping container equipped with a toilet and reserve water etc to last at least 24 hours, as your last stay and fight refuge/firestorm shelter.
If we are to return to past practice? Then let it be grazed national parks and selectively logging of all bushland! And where logging roads became natural fire breaks and where dozens more eyes were there and alert to any outbreak of fire!
Alan B.