“Oh you are awful “, as Dick Emery/ Dame Edna would put it! I’m so weak when threatened/bullied, your more Frightening than Grimacing-Greta, don’t worry you sensitive young so,…be patient.

Your follow-up “Just to clarify: I wasn't threatening to sue. When I said "make it official" I meant I'd report you, which could result in a ban.” Your followup Post ‘fwithened' poor senile pig-ignorant old tart like weak me.

I reoeat, be patient, generate serenity with Yoga induces "NO2-nasal excercises.Yer mucker be BBF “Grimacing Greta“ climate-stress” CCC derived COVID-19/96gg special weapons grade virus the Russians are help her develop in her Mummies Shed, at the bottom of her net-zero emitting Swedish home.., the one behind the sauna and steaming lap- pool and hot top, if you recal.

I assume you’ve been round for her famous “candle-lit suppers of herrings and caviar avec organic champers”, assuming you got a ride on that Aussie-rich-kid-yachts she has commandeered to shout “ how dare you… global, nomad old farts must die!” to all the wealthy retired old tarts like me stuck on that fleet of coffin-ship Cruise ships wandering the ocean spewing out COVID-19 and worse CO2 emissions,.

Dear mhaze,

What a slippery use of figures. Why on earth are you using Hansen's 2010 figures when the 2019 are available.

Temperature anomaly compared to 1951-1980 average, in degrees Celsius

Scenario A – 1.565

Scenario B – 1.104

Actual from GISTemp NASA - .980

Scenario C - .0606

http://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-01-30/1988-global-warming-forecast-by-james-hansen-proved-mostly-true

Hansen was pretty well spot on and far closer to B than C. Why try and fudge with old figures? Doesn't fit your argument perhaps? Either way you are being dishonest once again.

Please stop.

Well said mhaze, this Aiden troll is worse and more "hubristic" than Steel-Rednuts!

He is a nasty little boy, who when I first stood in front of a calls of 9 year olds, who be give the cane/birch, and made to either sit on the corner and forced to serve milk to his class mates for a week.

But then I' old-fart AJ awaiting a CCC hit-man to take me out!

The only major country approaching net zero is France which obtains nearly 80% of its power from nuclear and with reprocessing of its fuel has little to no nuclear waste and nearly the cheapest power in Europe.

That its safety record is better than any other power source in Europe is yet another statistic that the nuclear deniers are trying to bury.

SR,

Your link is paywalled, but thanks for making my point ie that scenario A was rubbish yet was the most favoured among the climate hysterics until it became untenable to do so.

SM,
"The only major country approaching net zero is France..."
I'm not opposed to nuclear but electricity production is only one aspect of an economy. France is nowhere near zero. Per capita French emissions are still over 5 mt CO2e /pa - lower than most but miles from zero - and nationally France's carbon footprint is over 670 Mt CO2e pa.

Additionally the recent French trend is up not down.

Of course, if, like me, you think the level of emissions is neither here nor there in the great scheme of things, then issues about relative emissions is a mere curiosity

yep we seen all those body bags in Italy, Spain and China caused by gw. The charlatans still want to ensure their tax payer (those lucky enough to have a job) funding flow into their pockets. I mean gw has stolen people's future not Coronavirus. How dare they?