The Forum > Article Comments > Defusing the Korean time bomb > Comments
Defusing the Korean time bomb : Comments
By Gary Brown, published 26/9/2005Gary Brown examines the ramifications of the agreement by North Korea to abandon nuclear weapons programs.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
I think your argument that if one country has nuclear weapons then all are entitled, is defective.
- countries that already have these weapons will not disarm
- will it make it a safer, more stable, world if many more countries have these weapons.
- In World War Two Germany had (a fortunately intermittent) nuclear program. Would it have been better if not only the US, but Hitler had nuclear weapons during that war?
If countries are to have these weapons (and they always will) its better that they are onside, as the US is, rather than paranoid and twitchy (like North Korea).
"...not easy..."
If I were a South Korean who has experienced invasion from North Korea (1949-53), and several border incidents since, I'd be a little less complacent.
Note that the South Korea capital is in artillery range of the North/South Korean border - so North Korea does not need a sophisticated delivery system (just old fashioned nuclear shells) to use the weapon. This makes North Korea's future ownership of nuclear weapons a genuinely quick and deadly prospect for Koreans in the south.
"...easy..." Why is North Korea using its limited resources to develop nuclear weapons if its not game to use them outside its borders? Do you think it has a grand strategy to use these bombs internally?