Thanks for your responses, Bazz.

My initial entry onto this comment thread was to challenge/counter Leo’s assertion that “There is no science to support it [i.e. a “human effect on climate”]

It seems clear to me that there is science which supports Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC). You have also presented science which supports an alternative theory (Cosmic Rays – Clouds). I’m sure there is also science which rejects ACC.

Jennifer Marohasy recently wrote: “Science is a method, science is never settled. We must therefore always be open-minded, tolerant and ready to be proven wrong.”

[Jennifer Marohasy: ‘How to Evaluate the Evidence of Contrarians – Scientifically’.
https://jennifermarohasy.com/2019/09/how-to-evaluate-the-evidence-of-contrarians-scientifically/]

Yes, VK3AUU. More vacuous and baseless remarks. Ut no science, because you have none to justify the blatant climate raud, and your fraud promoter, Michael Mann has confirmed his dishonesty by the failure of his ridiculous court case. There is no science to show human caused climate change.
Correlation does not prove causation to a scientist, only to a fraud promoter who ignores science, such as Alan B.

Dear Alison Jane,

Can I ask what physical property of CO2 would you like me to ignore in order to accept that increasing the concentration of this significant green house gas by a third has had no impact on global temperatures?

Alison, from what I have read the IPCC models do not take account of
cloud cover on temperature.
The effect of lower cloud cover was allocated to co2.
Hence according to Hk/Kobe the co2 effect was very
small. 0.01 deg C or was it 0.001 C, I forgot which.
There has always been an argument about the sensitivity of co2 on
temperature and that could be the solution.

What impact have the holes in the ozone layer from the countless rockets ? Do they let extra Sun heat through ? Should we stop space exploration & stop using the Internet ?
Greta's been very quiet on the impact of technology which the Millennials can't live without.

Just watching the Insiders right now I couldn't help being utterly dismayed at the ignorant mentality of the panel, especially when they talked about Climate change protesters.
Do we really have to tolerate such indoctrinated mutts forcing their limited sense views onto our young at taxpayers expense ?