Sign InThe Forum > Article Comments > Why we should not have an ambassador to the Holy See. > Comments
Why we should not have an ambassador to the Holy See. : Comments
By Meg Wallace, published 12/6/2019Since when did the Australian people vote to share government with the Holy See? This undermines the separation of church and state.
- Pages:
- ‹
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- ›
- All
Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 13 June 2019 11:10:29 AM
| |
Hi VK3AUU
I rather think His Most Reverend Eminence [1] Cardinal Pell, may beat his paedophilia rap at retrial. What with the legal war chest funded by rich Australians. Pell can then wing his way back to luxurious life at the Vatican, above secular laws again. No need for Pell's good mate and sidekick, Abbott (in Australia or Rome/Vatican) to cover for Pell. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/His_Eminence#Catholicism Posted by plantagenet, Thursday, 13 June 2019 5:58:41 PM
| |
The authorities are lining up some more charges. I don't he is quite free yet.
David Posted by VK3AUU, Thursday, 13 June 2019 11:02:26 PM
| |
The Vatican is recognised as a sovereign state, and as such the decision to establish ambassadorial relations should be a diplomatic one, not whether one whinge bag atheist is offended by Catholicism.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 18 June 2019 11:17:55 AM
|
I think you are on the money there. We won't have His Eminence there any longer. We probably didn't need an ambassador as well while he was there.
David