The Forum > Article Comments > Trickle-down or trickle-up? > Comments
Trickle-down or trickle-up? : Comments
By Mike Pope, published 12/4/2018Company tax cuts may benefit shareholders and executives rather than other employees, and Australia has sufficient incentives to attract foreign investment already.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Cant really have one without the other or the system will fail.
You need good policies for money to trickle down from the top and good policies to ensure money is injected at the bottom.
Tax reform at the top, it's a travesty individuals are taxed massively but companies aren't taxed at all.
I propose a 5% component which must be paid as tax by all companies regardless of minimisation strategies.
Second Welfare reform.
Double dole for full-time work paid daily doing thing help the government save money. Why pay $250wk for nothing if you can pay $500 and get a full time worker?
Workers build infrastructure to lower cost of energy and transport and to increase job and business opportunities in the private sector.
Makes use of the 5% unemployed workers capatalism needs to prevent wage growth, but gives them the job you have when you don't have a job.
Creates culture of employment within ranks of the unemployed, plus reduced costs of training.
Am I really the only person in the damn country who can figure out the basic simplicity of how to fix it?