The Forum > Article Comments > The Banking Royal Commission and the risk that dare not speak its name > Comments
The Banking Royal Commission and the risk that dare not speak its name : Comments
By John Murray, published 28/3/2018The Banking Royal Commission seems to be revealing a situation that looks like systemic risk, but because its terms of reference don't include systemic risk, this serious issue cannot be confronted.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
"The agreement between the G20 countries, including Australia, and the IMF
means that if a bank gets into trouble then the IMF's Financial
Stability Board can arrive on any banks doorstep one morning and take
any amount of depositors funds to pay the the debt of the defaulting bank."
I've called you out on this before. WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO TELL LIES?
The Financial Stability Board is not part of the IMF. Neither they nor the IMF have any power whatsoever to confiscate even a cent from depositors.
By claiming otherwise, you are defaming both the Financial Stability Board and the banks. I know they are unlikely to sue, but libel is still immoral.
What the FSB actually does is devise procedures to hep prevent banks from collapsing. But implementing those procedures is a matter for national governments.
Neither Swan nor Hockey made any deal to put depositors' money at risk.
As for that Italian man, ISTR he was a bondholder not a depositor.