The Forum > Article Comments > Believing in deterrence: responding to North Korea > Comments
Believing in deterrence: responding to North Korea : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 14/8/2017There is an awareness that the wealth to the south, across the DMZ, is not to be sneered at. Nor is suffering to be cherished.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
One of the reasons for continued hostility to North Korea is the US military industrial complex needs enemies to justify its continued funding. A phenomenon that goes on with both small and large government departments which exist to solve problems. If it looks like not enough to keep them well supported, they often try to find more problems, beat up existing ones and/or create some new ones.
Then note how the US has long behaved on the world stage like a schoolyard bully. Finds all sorts of pretexts to infiltrate and attack other countries. Especially to depose leaders whose policies are not favourable to US billionaires, banksters, corporations and military. To be reasonably sure of keeping bullies away, those likely to be targeted need capability of strong retaliation. NK has no hope of having military forces technically comparable with its US led potential enemies. Without the threat of then carrying out a successful nuclear strike in retaliation if attacked, North Korea would almost certainly quickly go the same way as Libya. Note Iran has been large and developed enough to organise a non nuclear military to strongly deter a US attack, which Zionists have been trying to encourage on behalf of Israel.. When it makes agreements with other countries, if they are 'stretched' or breached, it is usually done first by the US who carry on as if they are "exceptional". North Koreans basically behave defensively with above points in mind.