The Forum > Article Comments > Debating bad ideas > Comments
Debating bad ideas : Comments
By Laurence Maher, published 2/8/2017Ironically, HT has done Australians an unintended favour by challenging them to investigate and debate the merits of HT's theocratic detestation of secular Western liberal democracy.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
That they had to personally revise and edit until it fitted what they prefered to believe, then compelled under the fear of death or worse, to force/spread their man made doctrine, dogma and ideology.
If these dogma/stone age superstitions had a foundation in irrefutable truth! It wouldn't need to be defended, but could stand on merit against all inquisition or informed debate!
And applies to all man made or invented superstition! And not just a highly revised edited Qoran. But all, [rife with plagiarism, embellishment and contradiction,] three books!
All so revised rewritten and endlessly edited, to almost destroy any semblance between the original texts and today's hugely revised offerings!
But why bother, when it is clearly pointless, when you are facing cannot err, brainwashed cults! Who to a generic man, fear the light of day and the plain unvarnished truth!
Given that would expose them and their fakery for what it is! Stoneage, [thou shalt not,] man made, medieval, Ritual and Dogma!
If you are going to preach it, you need to first practise it! And then lead by shining exemplary {do unto others] example!
Dog whistling pulpit pounders are in abundant over supply! Don't point to the log in his eye, when the one in yours is bigger!
Alan B.