The Forum > Article Comments > Abortion coercion: the NRL still has a long way to go in its treatment of women > Comments
Abortion coercion: the NRL still has a long way to go in its treatment of women : Comments
By Rachael Wong, published 20/3/2017We need to train our health professionals and pregnancy counsellors to detect when women are seeking an abortion under duress and to act accordingly.
- Pages:
- ‹
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- ›
- All
Coercion, can mean threats of harm or some sort of unreasonable pressure on a person to comply. The bits I've heard about were offers of short term financial gain and it being made clear that the men involved were not choosing to take on an active role of father.
I'm not personally a liker of abortion, at the same time I've come to the conclusion that choice is the lesser of evils when weighed against the alternatives and what flows from trying to remove that choice. It does seem though that many who favour female choice strenuously oppose male choice.
Not quite the same set of choices, the male should not have any right to demand a termination not to demand that a pregnancy is carried to term. However he should have the same rights to choose his own future role at the same points a woman is free to choose her future role as far as viable given the biological necessities.
If she chooses to continue with a pregnancy knowing that the male involved in the conception has opted out then she should not be able to bring the power of the state to bear to coerce him to pay the bills for her choice.
If choice ends at the time of the sex act then it should end for both genders.
R0bert