The Forum > Article Comments > Moral panics and whistling up the dogs > Comments
Moral panics and whistling up the dogs : Comments
By Craig Minns, published 29/8/2016This one is about the existence of a website on which schoolboys are sharing images of schoolgirls, which are, apparently, principally the work of those girls themselves in the form of 'selfies'.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
yep secularism with all its stupidity somehow making out its a girls right to post herself nude on the internet and somehow think that men are not going to look. How dumbed down can the feminist go. To think that the education system has been overtaken by these people. Now in the name of 'safe schools' they want to put every perverted thought into the minds of young boys and girls and will be first to scream about the outcomes.
Posted by runner, Monday, 29 August 2016 2:21:01 PM
| |
Thanks for the "contribution" Daffy, I'm sure you did your best.
Isprey, yes, I make a point of reading references before I cite them. The Summers piece was about typical middle-class issues, packaged as a political "call to arms". She's been doing the same thing for at least 35 years and has made a great quid out of it. Nothing new there, just the same old tired partisan political schtick. I agree with you that this moral panic has little to do with feminism; that was the whole point of the article. It's merely another attempt to paint men (or boys, in this case) as morally inferior to women. It's hypocritical, cheap and tawdry gender politics, nothing more. If Tony Abbott did it the same people who are jumping on the bandwagon would be howling for blood. Posted by Craig Minns, Monday, 29 August 2016 2:39:57 PM
| |
Daffy Duck,
That author you recommend is certainly way out there. Talking about 'Wonderful Womyn', the 'Goddesses' who are tragically destined to live in a world with those awful men and boys, whatever went wrong here, <CEO of Mylan defends EpiPen price hike: ‘No one is more frustrated than me’ AUGUST 26, 2016 THE CEO credited with single-handedly ratcheting up the price of lifesaving, injectable allergy medicine has deflected the blame on to an “industry in crisis”. Heather Bresch, the head of pharmaceutical company Mylan, was slammed this week after it was revealed the cost of an EpiPen had skyrocketed under her watch by more than 400 per cent.> http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/ceo-of-mylan-defends-epipen-price-hike-no-one-is-more-frustrated-than-me/news-story/5e8c18273b6d6c83b95014ba705b253a Are the Heathers fallen angels? And are they blameless? All down to the bad done by men that made them slip too? That goddess stuff is really wacko, but some women do go for that stuff. Do you watch the late night crystal reading too? Posted by onthebeach, Monday, 29 August 2016 4:24:12 PM
| |
I have no time for feminists, but I think the young boys referred to in this article should be finding something better to do.
I vary between pity and disgust for the younger generation. One the one side they face a very dim future with the overpopulation of the country, depletion of resources, a disconnect with nature, and increasing divisiveness due to multiculturism. One the other side many of the younger generation seem to be fat, lazy, have minimal work ethic, and they are allowing themselves to become americanised by watching american movies, listening to american music and playing with their american spyphones. Watching american movies, listening to american music and playing with american spyphones has been found to make people depressed, and the younger generation is setting themselves up future bouts of depression (which will probably make them eat more, become fatter and become more lazy). The young boys and the young girls should find something better to do other than taking pictures of themselves with their american spyphones and posting them on the internet. Posted by interactive, Monday, 29 August 2016 5:17:47 PM
| |
What harm may ensue? You're are joking surely?
For starters, what about the shame of being outed by folks never ever intended as recipients of your personal imagery, which by the way, ought to be protected by copyright; to keep out of the hands of sick salivating strangers and the paparazzi? Who by the way, hounded Diana to her premature death just trying to get some intimate or scandalizing shot! What harm? How about in a future contest for the otherwise deserved promotion and equally deserved rise, some of this ostensibly private, for your eyes only, personal property emerged!? And if years later on the dawn of marriage, this immature, I trust you sweetheart, schoolgirl romance stuff emerged, to then completely foul the wedding plans and any future happiness? It's just too easy for judgemental moralizing males to put licentious labels on Ladies, or their essentially innocent victims? Or indeed, blame the victim as the Author has done so well here? I hope he's not a parent of young women, given his blame shifting and very convenient attitude; and parsimonious sermonizing! None of which would be possible if the intended recipients returned the pics instead of sharing with their salivating like pavlov's dogs, little shiites mates!? It's not as if any of these lasses posed for public exposure in the mass media! Or intended that it find its way there! Alan B. Posted by Alan B., Monday, 29 August 2016 5:24:19 PM
| |
The problem is started by the little tarts who pose for, and disseminate the photos to someone they think think that is trustworthy. If it were not for these grubby little sheilas, who are now complaining, there would be no problem. What the hell do they expect from testosterone-loaded young males - young males, incidently, who we are constantly reminded by feminists - are not as 'mature' as the girls. What a fuss about nothing! If you don't want your bits revealed to all and sundry, don't flash them around in the first place, idiots.
Posted by ttbn, Monday, 29 August 2016 5:55:22 PM
|