The Forum > Article Comments > Animal welfare and the judgement of history > Comments
Animal welfare and the judgement of history : Comments
By Simon Caterson, published 29/7/2016It wasn't so long ago that Australia, like other countries such as the United States, had a whaling industry that employed many people, yet no one now calls for that trade to be revived.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 2 August 2016 8:04:36 AM
| |
My article did not mention official action that has been taken in relation to the Four Corners report on the sledgehammer slaughter of Australian live export cattle in Vietnam. Here is a link to an announcement:
http://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/media-centre/media-releases/allegations-animal-cruelty-vietnam-15-july-16 Posted by Simon Caterson, Wednesday, 3 August 2016 8:06:13 AM
| |
Maybe humpback whales (at 10% increase yearly) which feed in Antarctica are surviving better than right whales which feed in coastal waters and swallow plastic rubbish. This also affects sea-birds and seals etc. But at 6% growth yearly maybe..
" Early colonists observed large numbers of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) in the bays and inlets along the coast during their annual migration north from Antarctica. In July 1804 Knopwood claimed that in crossing the River Derwent, 'we passed so many whales that it was dangerous for the boat to go up the river unless you kept very near the shore'." Posted by nicknamenick, Sunday, 21 August 2016 11:23:01 AM
|
Squeezing our farmers will ultimately come at a huge cost one day.