Of course battered person syndrome exists, but how does that constitute “scientific proof” that Mrs Hunt was a “feminazi terrorist”? Or that it is a “scientifically proven fact” that Mr Hunt “was given NO other option or choice for protecting his children”? These are the claim you have made, and they are meaningless.

Where exactly on THIS thread have “feminazis” been “extremely emotional & indecent towards men”? It is you who have used the words “nazi”, “torture”, “terrorist”, “matriarchal nanny state”, and discussed your own plan to murder your children’s mother.

"Is Mise, from Hindus, the British did try hard to stamp it out but it began creeping back after independence."

Just how does that sentence fit into the discussion?

Rhian, i repeat the evidence of her dreadful behaviour was already supplied by the article, you chose to provide excuses for her behaviour & NO excuses for his behaviour, i just proved your hypocrisy to you.

Where have you been for the last half century misandry is every where, it's purpose is to create poverty & abuse children, a job misandry has done very well.

Is Mise, Where did you get that,imacentristmoderate? from Hindus.

the British did try hard to stamp it (sati) out but it began creeping back after independence, now does it fit?

Imacentristmoderate

It’s you who lays the blame entirely with one of the parties. I didn’t. Nor did Suse or any other poster here. Read my first post. I said that that both Geoff and Kim’s behaviour was affected by their mental problems:

“Geoff’s depression and Kim’s brain damage contribut[ed] to a ghastly outcome”

@imacentristmoderate, I think you mean that he felt that he had no choice. He could have taken the kids and run, but his conscience didn't allow him to do so. Under the circumstances, the Family Court would rule in his favour.

The case is very sad. We are told that all DV is caused by sexist men with out-dated views. Real cases, such as this, are far more complex.