What is this “evidence”, of which you speak, Bilmc?
Refer us to the science which shows any measurable effect on climate by human emissions.
Explain to us why, when the “experts” informed us that human emissions were causing dangerous global warming, global warming stopped, almost 19 years ago.
When you find that you cannot do so, will you stop talking rubbish?

Bilmic is another climate fraud supporter, who responds to a request to justify his baseless assertions by disappearing from the thread.

His babbling nonsense about the non-existent science, is reminiscent of Rudd, who signed the fraudulent Kyoto Protocol.

IFF, there has been a 'pause' in global warming for nineteen years, then all those of us under twenty six or seven have no memory of global warming.

What does 'greenhouse' mean ? That vegetable growers use CO2 to stimulate growth of their crops - up to 1200 parts per million.

But, even if the 'pause' is non-existent, in the northern hemisphere - far more land-focused that we are here in the southern hemisphere - every degree rise in ambient temperature would mean an extra growing area of perhaps a million square kilometres of extra land to grow wheat and barley and potatoes. Perhaps this is a catastrophe in some way: as a dull-witted person, I don't know, but it sounds like a win-win situation to me. More food production across millions of square kilometres ? Longer summers and less snow in Britain ?

Questions: how is the supposed global warming affecting Africa and South America, straddling the equator as they do ? Is global warming having dreadful effects in Indonesia ?

Just wondering.

Joe