The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > An open letter to Pope Francis on climate change > Comments

An open letter to Pope Francis on climate change : Comments

By Authors climate letter to Pope Francis, published 12/5/2015

We commend you for your care for the earth and God's children, especially the poor. With this letter we raise some matters of concern that we ask you to consider as you convey that guidance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
Nonsense, warmair, the satellite readings show no current warming.
Roy Spencer, one of the scientists iinvolved in the recording of temperature by satellite, wonders where the global warming comes from, now that it has stopped.
He concludes that it comes from the revision of temperature records. He says, in relation to revision of temperature records:
“ the drift in satellite local observation time associated with orbit decay causes spurious cooling in the 1:30 satellites, but spurious warming in the 7:30 satellites. Again this shows that a variety of errors typically have positive and negative signs.
In contrast, the thermometer data apparently need to be adjusted in such a way that almost always leads to greater and greater warming trends.
How odd.”
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2015/03/even-though-warming-has-stopped-it-keeps-getting-worse/

The warming is human caused, not by emissions, but by adjustment of the temperature record.
The hottest years in the U.S. the 1930s, are now adjusted to being cooler, and the fraud-backers herald each ensuing year as “hottest year yet” in their desperation to show an upward temperature trend. Their assertion about 2014 is blown out of the water, but the climate fraud Hansen has already announced 2015 as “hottest year ever”.
You disappeared for a while , warmair, when you had no science to support your position, and we established that your dishonesty was the only basis for your support of the climate fraud. Now you bob up again, still with no science to show that human emissions have any measurable effect on climate, and dishonesty your only basis for your assertions.
Posted by Leo Lane, Thursday, 14 May 2015 1:09:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
For your assistance on current lack of any global warming:
"Roy Spencer, John Christy, and William Braswell of the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) Earth System Science Center recently released Version 6 (V.6) of their global satellite temperature dataset.
The revision is noteworthy in several respects. First, as the scientists point out, the UAH dataset more closely matches the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) dataset, a separate satellite monitoring program, which shows no net warming since Dec. 1996. In the RSS record, the length of the warming pause is now 18 years five months."
http://www.globalwarming.org/2015/05/05/independent-satellite-records-agree-little-to-no-global-warming-over-past-18-years/
Posted by Leo Lane, Thursday, 14 May 2015 1:34:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We may not hear from warmair for a year or two, but his efforts in supporting the climate fraud have earned him a place in the warmist Hall of Shame.
Recalling Nigel Calder’s words when he first formed the concept of the Hall of Shame:
.” What if the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had done a responsible job, acknowledging the role of the Sun and curtailing the prophecies of catastrophic warming?
For a start there would have no surprise about the “travesty” that global warming has stopped since the mid-1990s, with the Sun becoming sulky. Vast sums might have been saved on misdirected research and technology, and on climate change fests and wheezes of every kind. The world’s poor and their fragile living environment could have had far more useful help than precautions against warming.
And there would have been less time for so many eminent folk from science, politics, industry, finance, the media and the arts to be taken in by man-made climate catastrophe. (In London, for example, from the Royal Society to the National Theatre.) Sadly for them, in the past ten years they’ve crowded with their warmist badges into a Hall of Shame, like bankers before the crash.
http://calderup.wordpress.com/2011/08/24/cern-experiment-confirms-cosmic-ray-action/
Posted by Leo Lane, Thursday, 14 May 2015 9:53:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Interesting....

"Rather, we mean that because humanity alone bears the imago Dei, any effort to protect the environment must put at its center human well-being,"

This one comment hits on the fundamental problem that we face. They forget whether or not we are the cause of global warming or not is a matter of indifference to nature. If we ignore the science we may well find that within a matter of a generation the world is uninhabitable not only for us but for mist other species. It will not matter a great deal - in an other few million years no doubt this rather insignificant planet will have given rise to new flora and fauna and apart from some creatures like the cockroaches none of us will survive; in fact there will be no evidence that we ever existed.
Of course the downside is that one will not be able to say toanyone "i told you so."
Posted by BAYGON, Friday, 15 May 2015 1:49:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Baygon, please inform us of the science that is being ignored. There is no science to show that human emissions have any measurable effect on climate.
Your post is probably the most pointless and baseless on this thread.
Considering the posts against which you are being measured, that really says something about your education, or lack thereof.
Posted by Leo Lane, Friday, 15 May 2015 3:09:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Baygon is another climate fraud supporter, who responds to a request to justify his baseless assertions by disappearing from the thread.

If Baygon is not his correct name, I trust that he has complied with his obligation to obtain permission for its use from S.C Johnson & Son Inc. USA, who own the intellectual property rights to the name
Posted by Leo Lane, Tuesday, 19 May 2015 11:00:39 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy