The Forum > Article Comments > Right Charlies, but not Charlie > Comments
Right Charlies, but not Charlie : Comments
By David Leyonhjelm, published 27/1/2015The rest of us – with the partial exception of the US – have buckled. There are widespread restrictions on speech, in France and elsewhere. Australia has 18C, among many others.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Posted by Is Mise, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 7:35:17 AM
| |
Is Mise the false flag horse is far from dead. You have shot down your own argument. Why wear a mask and leave behind your ID? Why won't they reveal the details of the Inspector's autopsy?
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 8:10:07 AM
| |
Suffering comprehension problems, Arjay?
I asked the question for you and gave an answer. The autopsy report? We shall wait and see. Posted by Is Mise, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 8:55:45 AM
| |
Is Mise,"To save you the effort, it was because the balaclava is de rigueur for Islamic terrorists; it's almost a fashion statement"
Posted by Is Mise, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 7:35:17 AM So it was a fashion statement for supposed Islamic terrorists who were totally incinerated in 911 to leave their passports intact for the FBI to find? Why try to escape the law when you want to be a martyr? They were killed yet again,like many patsies et al Lee Harvey Oswald, before any defence was mounted to report their innocence. Have another look at the other farce of the cop reported killed on MSM and who is obviously still alive. http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-shootings-censored-video The other reason why France has suffered this attack was that President Hollande of France wanted the sanctions against Russia to cease. The other reasons were France's recognition of the Palestinian oppression, France wanting side with Germany on leaving the EURO currency and France wanting to deliver 2 war ships to Russia. Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 28 January 2015 8:23:25 PM
| |
So, the reason why Tony Abbot squibbed on 18C, was so he could suck up to the Muslims living among us.
Message to Tony. Islam is not a religion of tolerance or inclusiveness. The Australian Islamic Council has approached the federal government seeking exemptions from voting for Muslims. This is a religion which opposes democracy and everything democracy stands for, like freedom of speech. And you want to appease them? We are even paying danegeld to Muslim religious leaders to supposedly deprogram their "radical" youth from following the literal teachings of Islam, and going on jihad against us. Ain't multiculturalism grand? What might be a lot more effective is to order Muslim religious leaders to clean up their violence and misogynistic religion, or we will instigate a complete ban on Muslim immigration. That should get their attention and it won't cost the Aussie taxpayer a cent. I would like to note that Andrew Bolt got prosecuted for simply pointing out that some people can be perceived as rorting our generous welfare subsidies to aborigines. He did not "incite violence" but he was prosecuted and convicted anyway. But the woman who held up the banner "Behead those who insult the Prophet" at a very violent Muslim demonstration in Sydney, was, according to newspaper reports, simply "spoken to" by welfare officers who explained to this poor, violence advocating Muslim, the error of her ways. It is this clear double standard treatment of Australians and Muslims which galls Aussies the most. We must watch what we say, but they can say any damn thing they like. The woman's sign was a clear incitement to violence, and it turned out that she was a recently arrived immigrant. Putting her on the first plane back to whatever Muslim craphole she originated from would have been far more effective than paying danegeld to the Muslim religious leaders, who to my mind are the real problem anyway. Posted by LEGO, Thursday, 29 January 2015 3:06:46 AM
| |
Arjay,
You're getting a bit mixed up! No one wears Passports. ".... So it was a fashion statement for supposed Islamic terrorists who were totally incinerated in 911 to leave their passports intact for the FBI to find?" In the link that you gave they make much of no one hearing the shot when the police Inspector killed himself, yet the explanation that the room was well insulated could account for the lack of sound. There could be other explanations as well. Posted by Is Mise, Thursday, 29 January 2015 7:04:09 AM
|
They left the ID behind because they wanted the world to know them as they were about to become martyrs and didn't want anyone else to steal the limelight.
You may counter with the question "Why were their faces covered?"
To save you the effort, it was because the balaclava is de rigueur for Islamic terrorists; it's almost a fashion statement