The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Remembering Australia’s first Jihadist attack on 1 January 1915 > Comments

Remembering Australia’s first Jihadist attack on 1 January 1915 : Comments

By David Singer, published 2/1/2015

The Department of Veteran's Affairs announced last March that the centenary of the Battle of Broken Hill on 1 January 2014 would not be formally commemorated by the Australian Government.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All
David, I still "allege" that the Smithsonian account is a secondary account of this event. Because that is what it is. My chapters are also secondary accounts about this event. Can you not see the point being made here about the importance of ceding authority to primary sources? ALL sources also need to be handled with caution, whether they are primary or secondary of course: even eye witnesses can be mistaken about what they see or the meaning of what they see. That is why I spend a lot of time in writing more about how even the primary sources were constructed in this case.

I agree with your sarcastic comment that my chapters will not make my fortune. Alas.

My offer to send you the chapters when I have completed them stands. I'm sorry that I can't add any more that is useful or that you would listen to anyway at the moment. Thank you for allowing me to say this much on your comments page.

Helen
Posted by isabelberners, Thursday, 8 January 2015 9:33:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy