The Forum > Article Comments > Why on earth wouldn't Labor support privatisation? > Comments
Why on earth wouldn't Labor support privatisation? : Comments
By Graham Young, published 31/10/2014Labor oppositions campaigning against the privatisation of assets by state and federal governments should think again. It's in their political and economic interests to allow them to proceed.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
-
- All
To start with our neighbourhood watch area has 880 homes & growing. No more than 20 are commercial farms, just acreage living lifestyle blocks, with many amateur equestrian people. There is no town water, every one of them supply their own water, & there is no tax deductibility involved.
Those further out who farm, contributed to a rural water scheme, & spent big dollars up front. They have between $25,000 & $60,000 annual bill for maintained of the damn & infrastructure, to be in the scheme, plus a charge per megalitre for the water they draw.
A few years back, when it was dry, that bastard of a man Beattie took the water from their dam to supply Swanbank Power Station, leaving them with no water at all for 2 years, but they still had to pay the infrastructures maintenance. Any form of tax deductibility is pretty useless when you have no production, no income, so no tax.
I might mention that in 2 recent years, when we had too much rain, also reducing production, they drew no water, but they still had to pay that infrastructure cost.
Our local council, & most country councils, have spent heaps on water infrastructure for the towns folk, most of which the residents pay in rates & water rates. It is only the city folk who have the major investment in dams picked up by the state government.
Continued