What a pathetic attempt to misrepresent/ deny ones Creator. Of course 20% or more of the cloth deny the resurrection of Jesus. It was men of the 'cloth' who had Him crucified. It is men of the 'cloth' like Dawkins and churchman who fail considerably in their personal lives that then have to replace morality with their own form of failure. The only 'new' evidence confirms how right Jesus was when describing the corrupt state of men's hearts.

The reality is that men like Brian and all the deniers of the Son of God are haters of God because their own corrupted morality is exposed by Jesus. He shows his true agenda by

'The evidence is overwhelming. With high levels of education, social advancement, and dramatic discoveries in science, the Western world is finally coming to recognise the Jesus myth is exactly that'

Yes higher levels of education have made many dumber, secular social advancements led to great drug usage, porn addiction, more rape, teenagers topping themselves, fatherless families, mothers choosing lesbian, perversion promoted. Congratualtions Brian you must be so proud.

The attacks on Christ are nothing new, have little to no substance and say more about the attackers who always seem to believe the totally idiotic belief that we came from nothing and that all the order that stares every person in the face came from chaos. I know who the fanciful ones are and they are not the believers in the only One who can save their soul but those dumb enough to deny that they will face their Maker one day.

Faith built on fiction, and probably underscored by mounting archaeological evidence, which literally destroys the Moses fable, along with (his alleged) commandments carved in stone, (by unfathomable celestial intelligence) for a largely illiterate race!
That said, emerging evidential revelations are not grounds for rejecting or dumping common human morality!
Or accepting (elder abuse) extermination, dressed up as (would do as much for a dog) fashionable euthanasia?
Even as cures for most conditions are being progressed along with palliative remedies, now up to a thousand more times more efficacious than morphine?
I mean, and let's face it head on!
How can people (possibly even your mum or dad) who have largely lost their marbles, give informed consent to their early extermination/termination of inconvenient longevity!?
Watching an inherently hostile elder live out the balance of their days in dribbling dementia, may not be pretty, particularly for younger (unrecognized/who the hell are you) relatives!
But if they're are relatively comfortable, and not being nursed 24/7 at home, by emotional fretting/irrational sleep deprived relatives; are not in any real physical or unmanageable pain.
Why can't they be allowed to live out their natural term?
We all of us will be old one day, and might not be too pleased, if our inherent right to live, could be simply terminated by a relative/partner eager to acquire our sometimes, megre possessions!?
Never ever give enduring powers of attorney to those who might eventually inherit, but rather, and only if actually necessary, the public trustee's office!
At the very least, we can expect impartial and fair outcomes, and according to actual instructions!
Rhrosty.

Rhosty, how about keeping to the matter under discussion, instead of branching off into all manner of things not even hinted at in the article. Your comments are completely off the track.

David

Oh dear, this article is about a hundred years too late!

Sells, is it possible that you actually agree with it?
David

So should we stop striving to love another
and doimg unto others as we like to be treated?