The Forum > Article Comments > Sensible public projects? Tell 'em they're dreamin' > Comments
Sensible public projects? Tell 'em they're dreamin' : Comments
By Mark S. Lawson, published 17/10/2014Unfortunately, political considerations get in the way. The politicians want headline-grabbing, vote-catching projects they can announce now, and never mind the details, or the cost-benefit analysis.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
I rarely or never watch reality shows.
This review makes me want to watch the whole series, despite its promise to be a blend of the two.
In my early uni years, late 1960's, BHP and others proposed a VFT with conditions that demonstrated absolutely that the project was about property development, not engineering or transport. From memory, they wanted the right to purchase any land they wished within 1km of the route and 10 km circle of the stations, absolute authority to rezone and develop it, and to flog the results.
Not surprising, it didn't get up.
The messages: (1)read the fine print and (2)watch the money trail.
VFT in Australia, by any name, is not about transport; it is about diverting public property to private hands, with the risks, downsides and consequences remaining with the people.