No science to justify your position, Christina?
I thought you based yourself on ignorance, as you nave demonstrated your ignorance of science, and how it works, but your last post shows your dishonesty.

You are a typical fraud-backer, with baseless malice against those who propagate the truth, and a disdain for science.

You refer to an article by a top climate scientist as "garbage".

Ha ha, far from being a "top climate scientist" in fact Bob Carter is one of a tiny few climate denialists, the ones chosen and touted by the likes of Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones
Bob Carter used to be an adjunct research fellow at James Cook University, but was axed from this position by the University. Carter has little credibility in the mainstream world of science.

Now - for a reference to someone whose opinion should carry far more weight than my humble scribblings, I strongly recommend the editorial in today's Age (8 Oct) - "Government drops ball on climate change" http://www.theage.com.au/comment/the-age-editorial/government-drops-ball-on-climate-change-20141007-3hhgq.html

'morning ChristinaMac1,

Oh dear, you put foot in mouth on this one did you not?

Any talk of "real scientists" just encourages me to point to small inconsistencies in your ignorance.

Might I ever so gently point out that the head of the IPCC, Rachender Pashauri is, ahem, a railway engineer and part time soft porn writer. I might also mention that the IPCC's Summary for Policy Makers (SPM) has not one single scientist of any description on its panel.

Just thought I might take this opportunity to show just what an ignorant prat you are.

Smile, reality might just pass you by.

Christina, pretending that you are stupid enough to believe that an editorial of the Age, criticising Tony Abbot and commending the climate liar Obama has any relevance, convinces no one.

It would be a positive step for you to read Robert Carter’s book, “Climate: the Counter Consensus”, where he sets out the true science of climate, as opposed to the nonsense of the mainstream consensus.

ChristinaMac, there is a sensible editorial for you to read, about the IPCC backing away from the global warming fraud which it promoted:
“OCTOBER 1 marked an important anniversary: 18 years during which the earth average temperature has remained unchanged.
Satellite data available from 1988 has allowed very precise measurements of global temperatures. These at first confirmed a warming trend.
But the satellite recordings, greeted with such enthusiastic fanfare by the warmist fraternity, have, for the past 18 years, bitten the hand that fed them.
A number of hypotheses have been advanced to explain the inconvenient truth of this data. But NASA has just reported that there is no evidence that the increased heat is hiding in the deep oceans.”

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/ipcc-calculations-show-global-warming-wont-be-harmful-if-it-resumes/story-e6frg6zo-1227083037892