The Forum > Article Comments > Gaza: Australian politicians duped by dud declaration > Comments
Gaza: Australian politicians duped by dud declaration : Comments
By David Singer, published 27/8/2014Seventy-two out of a possible 598 federal and state politicians have signed which attests to the savvy political acumen of those 526 who have refused to be duped by this dud declaration.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Posted by LEGO, Thursday, 28 August 2014 4:22:31 AM
| |
#Nowhereman
Bet you never heard the IRA threatening to wipe Great Britain off the face of the earth or the IRA firing 6000 rockets indiscriminately into British civilian population centers. If you can't tell who is worse you must be deaf, dumb and blind. Listen to this Imam http://www.memritv.org/embedded_player/thumbRequest.php?clip_id=4376 #SteeleRedux Interesting to see you writing to your local member and State Senators to sign the Declaration that has more holes in it than a piece of mouldy swiss cheese. Hope you at least had the decency to warn them of the 10 defects I pointed out in this article - or did you just "inadvertently" fail to mention them. Posted by david singer, Tuesday, 2 September 2014 7:39:13 PM
| |
Dear Singer,
I found no defects to be identified by the article but over the years have found innumerable defects in the author. BTW it would appear 2 more have added their names to the list. Posted by SteeleRedux, Tuesday, 2 September 2014 10:59:27 PM
| |
SteeleRedux
What a wonderful revelation - another two signatures added in the last six days since you started your letter writing campaign That makes 74 out of a possible 598 parliamentarians who have now shown their constituents how stupid and irresponsible they are to sign a document that is so inaccurate and misleading in its content. Posted by david singer, Wednesday, 3 September 2014 12:05:36 AM
| |
David Singer, why were 32 Palestinians killed in the West Bank since July?
If 1462 Israeli civilians had been killed in 50 days there would be world-wide outrage. Why not for the Palestinian civilians? Posted by markjohnconley, Saturday, 6 September 2014 1:34:45 PM
| |
Zionists the super-terrorists of the world; replicating what the Nazis did to those of the Judaic faith in the 30's.
Posted by markjohnconley, Saturday, 6 September 2014 1:36:59 PM
|
But Labor had a very serious problem.
Rising prosperity and aspirational working class people who were upwardly mobile, meant that people's voting preferences were changing. People were becoming more liberal in their views and therefore voting for the Libral Party. What Labor needed was a new voting base and Labor under Hawk became ardent supporters of multiculturalism, much to the horror of their reamaining working class supporters.
What Labor desperately needed was a large pool of dysfunctional voters who were forever welfare dependent and who could be guaranteed to always vote Labor in order to keep the welfare money flowing into their pockets. The aboriginal vote was already in the bag, and the new Muslim voting demographic conformed to that need rather admirably.
Labor switched sides on Israel because it's power base resides in once working class suburbs, now Muslim suburbs, from which the Labor working class is either fleeing or has fled in terror of the Muslims. It is laughable that so many OLO supporters of terrorists talk about "the Jewish lobby" when Labor is in the grip of "the Muslim lobby." Only last month, Muslim leaders, aware of their power over the Labor Party, threatened to withdraw electoral support from Labor unless they did more to help the Muslims exterminate the Jewish race in Palestine.
Right on cue, Labor politicians and the Greens (who also cherish the Muslim vote) started frothing at the mouth in self righteous indignation at the violence in Israel/Palestine and blaming it on the nasty Joos. The truth was that there were a lot more welfare dependent Muslims in Australia who could out vote the Joos, who voted for the Liberal Party anyway.