The Forum > Article Comments > Why Stiglitz is selling us a lemon > Comments
Why Stiglitz is selling us a lemon : Comments
By Angus Taylor, published 14/7/2014Stiglitz's idea is that inequality will cripple us if we don't apply the Robin Hood principle. Whilst relevant in the United States, this narrative is misplaced in an Australian context.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
For thousands of years humans have been developing labour-saving devices, and we have reached that state where there is just not enough work available to keep everyone usefully employed. 100 years ago most of us were employed on the land, but now about 5% of us grow enough to feed the world. Thousand of young women lost work when we developed automatic telephone exchanges, and many thousands more joined the work force after the war. John Maynard Keynes suggested that England could escape the Great Depression by employing thousands of people to dig holes, and thousands more to fill them in, but it took a war to finally end the depression.
This problem can only get worse, as smarter and ever smarter machinery takes over more and more work, but it's only a problem if the gains are shared unequally among us. The problem is falsely seen as a lack of work, when the real problem is a lack of money. If everyone, (you, me, and James Packer), were to receive a generous 'dole', of say $300, automatically deposited in one's account every Monday, and all income was taxed at a flat rate of 30%, say, we could do away with Centerlink, 90% of the ATO, tax consultants, a lot of prisons, and even some of the police force.
Abbot's intention to force young people off the dole, when the work just is not available, may force many young people into crime, and will cost us about $120,000 each to keep them in jail.