The Forum > Article Comments > Predicting the 'Super GFC': two very different views > Comments
Predicting the 'Super GFC': two very different views : Comments
By Syd Hickman, published 25/3/2014The key problem we now face is not that energy sources are going to suddenly disappear but that the surplus energy after extraction is already declining rapidly and will certainly decline faster in coming years.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
including how well-placed Australia would be in such a crisis situation.
Very badly placed actually. Our situation is very serious.
We are literally at the mercy of a number of countries.
Singapore could have us on the verge of starvation in a few weeks if it wanted.
Any country with a moderate navy or airforce could collapse Australian
economy in three weeks by sinking just one oil tanker and the insurers
would stop the rest.
Despite what Rhosty says there are no Saudi Arabias here or elsewhere
just waiting for the drillers. Why do you think they are filling in
with the tight oil fields in the US, drilling miles down in the ocean
digging up the tundra in Canada etc etc.
As the articles said any place that has been drilled and capped has
just not been worth developing otherwise they would have been a rush
of drilling rigs. The oil companies are now hard up, they are even
selling assets to pay dividends. Their revenues are decreasing.
The author made one mistake, the GFC occurred because peak oil was in
2005 and the rising oil price forced up the price of food and car
owners had a choice, buy food, petrol or pay the mortgage.
Their choice collapsed the mortgage funds and triggered the bomb that
the dopey bankers were sitting on.