I was of the view that backing of the AGW fraud arose from ignorance or dishonesty. Poirot and Luciferase compel me to add stupidity as a factor.

The fraud backers have put forward the proposition that human emissions have a significant effect on climate. There is no science to confirm this . Our mentally challenged heroes say the proposition is that human emissions do not affect climate, and the Realists bear the onus to prove this. Like asserting that God exists, and requiring a challenger to prove non existence

Regardless, there is peer reviewed science to show that the warming which has occurred is accounted for by natural cycles, leaving no room for the assertion that any warming is referable to human emissions. [McLean et al., 2009 published in Journal of Geophysical Research.
Fraud backers, concocted a rebuttal of the paper, which although of no substance and easily refuted, underlined their dishonesty

A climategate email from Trenberth confirms the unethical dealings of this fraud backer in his approach to the publisher of the Journal, American Geophysical Union

“Incidentally I gave a copy [of the Foster et al. critique] to Mike McPhaden and discussed
it with him last week when we were together at the OceanObs'09 conference. Mike is
President of AGU. Basically this is an acceptance with a couple of suggestions for extras,
and some suggestions for toning down the rhetoric. I had already tried that a bit. My reaction is that the main thing is to expedite this.”
Kevin Trenberth to Grant Foster, September 28, 2009

The assertion is that human emissions have a significant effect on climate. . The requirement that those dismissing the assertion, because it has no scientific basis, should provide scientific proof is fatuous. This debate has run its course and descended into the stupidity of empty statements by Heckle and Jeckle, presenting themselves as Poirot and Lucifer.

We should start with his one Leo Lane http://rsclive3.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_tcm18-173546.pdf

When you have read and understood that piece of research, we can discuss the implications.

Agronomist, I pointed out that there is no science to demonstrate that human emissions have any significant effect on climate, for which reason AGW is a fraud.

If you have any such science, then let me know what it is, and the reference to it.

If you think that the link you provided discloses any such science then I understand that your support for the AGW fraud is based on stupidity.

Yup...that's it folks.

The latest "scientific refutation" from "skeptics" is to label their opponents "dumb" or "stupid".

So that's "sham, fraud, belief system, superstition, dumb and stupid".

Cutting edge stuff, you'll all agree!

Poirot, there is no need to make stupid remarks to remind us that you have no science or rational assertion to justify your position.

We will not forget.

Agronomist was that paper written before or after we stopped bleeding people as a standard medical treatment?

Looks a bit like desperation to me.