cohenite, you do make up some excuses.

If you wanted to discuss the ARGO buoy data, you should have linked to it. Instead you linked to HadCRUT SST, which is from the ICOADS and GTS data sets. HadCRUT SST goes all the way back to 1662. You should have looked at the trend line since then on your argument.

The reason for showing the data is not a trick. It demonstrates the trend you chose for exactly what it is, a non-significant trend. It is not me being dishonest, cohenite. I merely point out again and again that your arguments and claims are completely without substance.

Anyway, toodle-doo. I have better things to do than pointing out denialist tropes.

"toodle-doo"

Toodle-loo to you to.

Just to be sure, when you combine the data anomaly points with the trend the scale of the decline is reduced. All the toodle-loos in the world won't change that fact.

Good point about ARGO and HadCrut SST. Put up ARGO SST and let's spot the toodle-loo difference, shall we?

unable to attend her normal duties due to choking on our fumes and the muck we are dumping in the water.
warmair,
We'll somehow need to get that across to the consumers, the military nuts, the motor sport nuts, the travellers, the health professionals, the anti abortionists etc etc.......in fact all those who think the growth is good.