I don't see how! Given that Temporary protection continues as long as the danger or persecution!?
People need to understand, that seeking legitimate asylum, doesn't automatically confer any inherent right, to also claim citizenship!
But particularly, if the applicant doesn't qualify for character reasons?
Rhrosty.

My main concern with TPVs is that the govt of the day will use them as a way of putting off making tough decisions. That, after the temporary protected persons have been here a while some "specialist in immigration law" will argue that since little Ali has had most of his schooling in Oz it would be cruel and inhumane to send him home, and equally inhumane to let him stay and make his family return, so little Ali and family will by default get permanent residency.

A highly technical article most notable in that the author "is a partner in D'Ambra Murphy Lawyers and an accredited specialist in immigration law."

Wondering whether the author was paid by D'Ambra Murphy Lawyers to write the article.

There may be a conflict of interest in providing advice on its humanitarian merits and spruiking for business.

I presume SPQR, the idea of TPVs is no family reunion, & thus no little Ali to get in the way of proper justice & removal of the boat person.

human rights as defined by the UN or more drownings? A no brainer.

Well done Kerry! Now what about no lawyers allowed in immigration tribunals set up to either accept or reject people presenting as refugee's.
Here is one for you Kerry a real doozy. SC who has been bankrupted 4 times. Every time for non-payment of taxes, how does that work?
I remember in the 1970's in Victoria there was the Solicitor's guarantee fund that paid out if a lawyer robbed you. There were so many millions stolen they ran out of money and it was all dropped. How about a sturdy defence of those two cases Kerry?