The Forum > Article Comments > Blocking Aussie Jihadists is overdue > Comments
Blocking Aussie Jihadists is overdue : Comments
By Joseph Wakim, published 12/11/2013So what is the incarnation of its 'baddies versus baddies' banner over-arching Syria? Why have we not seen the government launch Operation Foreign Fighters?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 13 November 2013 12:05:53 PM
| |
None of this is anything new. It's been going on for a long time.
Somalis who came here as "refugees" have been returning to fight for al-Shabaab --shows how much they are committed to Western liberal ideals,ay! And now the US and the Scandinavian countries are experiencing similar. It shows how easy it is to fool our vetting processes. Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 13 November 2013 5:49:42 PM
| |
Sorry Jay of Melbourne for
calling you ARjay I have a steaming great headcold at the moment which isn't helping my focus. Posted by CHERFUL, Wednesday, 13 November 2013 7:46:41 PM
| |
Wouldn't it be nice if we could just declare Islam a terrorist organization, and ban it?
Could we not just close the mosques, and any private Islamic schools, on the quite reasonable grounds that these have been shown to be breeding grounds for jihadists, and that their presence has been shown to lead to dreadful social consequences in all Western democracies? We seem to have international agreements that force us to commit cultural suicide. The boat people are almost all fleeing terrible countries, seeking refuge in Australia, seemingly unaware that they carry the virus - Islam - that made their home countries such shitholes in the first place. If we were to be seen as unfriendly to Islam, surely the boats would slow. As Gheert Vilders of The Netherlands points out, "The more Islam you have, the less freedom you have". As the great majority of Islamic countries are most unfriendly to Christianity, let's return the favour. LEGO, I quite often find you a lone voice of sanity in these discussions, and always look for your comments. Posted by Beaucoupbob, Friday, 22 November 2013 10:51:09 AM
| |
Never had any input from Joseph Wakim on this article. I think that if he writes an article her is obliged to give some input to argument. Otherwise he is just like all the other over paid Government parasites.
Posted by Jayb, Monday, 25 November 2013 1:56:48 PM
| |
We’ll now scrutinize the terminology and notions that are involved in the debate over Palestine and expose once again the deceitful nature that is unfortunately intrinsic to the contemporary progressive discourse.
http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/concealment-and-truth-in-palestine-and-beyond.html Zionism – Palestinian solidarity members are required to avoid the ‘J’ word and to use the word 'Zionism' instead. I recently revealed that Ali Abunimah, one of my current arch detractors, advised me a few years ago to refer to Zion when I really think Jewish so he and I “might find grounds for a lot of agreement….” In fact Abunimah was not alone. Jewish Voice For Peace approached me with a pretty much similar offer about the same time. The truth of the matter is that Israeli politics has little to do with Zionism. Israelis are hardly familiar with Zionist ideology, nor they are concerned or motivated by Zionist praxis. Zionism is largely a Jewish Diaspora discourse that vows to establish a Jewish National home in Palestine and to civilize the Jew by means of nationalism. Israel is obviously the product of the Zionist project; however, the Israelis see themselves as post-revolutionary subjects - they transformed the Zionist dream into a practical reality. Thus, criticism of Zionism per se hardly touches Israelis or Israeli politics. If anything, it actually diverts the attention from the crimes that are committed by the Jewish State in the name of the Jewish people. But then, why do we use the term Zionism instead of referring to Jewish power, Jewish politics or the Jewish State? Simple: we do not want to offend the ‘anti-Zionist' Jews and Jews in general. We consciously choose to let Israel off the hook. Apparently we much prefer to target a phantasmic imaginary object that means very little rather than simply calling spade a spade. Although the Brits have many war crimes attached to their names, the British Imperial War Museum decided to allocate a whole floor to the Jewish Holocaust instead of featuring one of the British-made genocides. The Brits, like everyone else, prefer to conceal their shame. http://mondoweiss.net/2013/11/american-speaking-opposition.html http://www.activistpost.com/2013/11/is-history-repeating-itself.html http://soaspalsoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SOASPALSOC-7th-Settler-Colonialism-2011.pdf Posted by one under god, Monday, 2 December 2013 5:30:52 AM
|
funny how you didnt grasp..the previous post
but mate..
it was..*ALL..a direct quote..of the author
[.see his main article].
[from..page two.]
but you clearly never read..page two
oh well..you have a chance
to do..a take two.
cheers..eh*
looks like this post applies to..you..too
ps..your no muslim..are you?
so you must..be..type one..or a type too.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6098#176065