The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Australia may not be open for business > Comments

Australia may not be open for business : Comments

By Harold Levien, published 14/11/2013

A substantial increase in unemployment seems inevitable when our new government has an ideological blockage to government intervention in industry.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All
<< The government could readily borrow say $10 billion to establish a National Development Corporation (NDC)…

Harold, I concur that something like an NDC would be a good idea. But $10b ??

An organisation like that wouldn’t take much money to run at all, would it?

It would basically just be a collection of experts from all the relevant sectors, who would work out strategies with a firm scientific, economic, social and environmental basis….which as you say would surely be a thousand times better than leaving it all up to a small set of numbskulls in the government!

However, it should surely be an NSC. A National Sustainability Corporation.

The governments’ thinking and that of most experts… and yours too Harold…. is still wrong-headed in seeing only development, growth, expansionism…. and apparently not seeing the importance of slowing down the demand for everything, the ever-increasing pressure on all our services, infrastructure, resource base and environment…. and striving for a stable population and a sustainable society.

The CSIRO was very good on all of this sort of stuff in its submission to the National Carrying Capacity Inquiry almost 20 years ago in 1994.

Perhaps they should be the organisation to lead the charge with a new NSC.

An NDC as you seem to envisage it would apparently only be dealing with one side of the all-important economic equation – the supply side. What we need is just as much attention to be paid to the demand side. If we had that, we’d definitely be on the right track to a healthy future. If we didn’t, all we would be doing is chasing the tail of continuous rapid growth and basically not getting anywhere.
Posted by Ludwig, Thursday, 14 November 2013 9:44:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Perhaps one needs to address why manufacturing etc. is going " pear shaped " before getting the government to raid the superannuation funds.

Perhaps one may ask the question: why don't we already have these high technology " start up" companies already in business over here?

How about looking at the cost structure imposed on businesses and that includes the level of wages , land etc. government taxes and regulations.

If the idea is "that good" why not go to a venture captalist for funding as they will ensure, befor parting with the investor funds, that the business case is sound ... This approach does not seem to be a strong point of government.

A decision was made long ago that we dig holes in the ground and trade in houses!

kilmouski.
Posted by Kilmouski, Thursday, 14 November 2013 1:38:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy