The Forum > Article Comments > even bigger rorts > Comments
even bigger rorts : Comments
By Don Aitkin, published 14/10/2013Governments too can behave as though money did really grow on trees, and demonstrate a blindness to the effect of such behaviour on the body politic.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
-
- All
We should brace ourselves for the mother of all junkets coming up in 2015: the Galipolli Centenary. Every politician and hanger-on will want to be there at our expense. My view is that politicians cause wars, and should be banned from Galipolli in 2015 in respect for those they sent to their death. The whole shebang should be run by the military for those currently serving, veterans and their families. I'd be happy to pay for that.
Posted by Candide, Monday, 14 October 2013 10:09:22 AM
| |
Some rorts are more impressive than others...I have to agree with Don there.
Here's the story of John Howard's barbecue for George W. Bush which masquaraded as a state occasion, but was in reality a rather private affair. Fascinating. http://nofibs.com.au/2013/08/24/howards-bush-barbecue-memories-to-prepare-for-abbott-government/ Posted by Poirot, Monday, 14 October 2013 3:40:22 PM
| |
lets not forget the hundreds Rudd took to Copenhagen for the Greens religous fest.
Posted by runner, Monday, 14 October 2013 4:23:53 PM
| |
Poirot,
you're forgetting something crucial here. Howard's Government put that money in the coffers in the first place. Rudd's Government blew it all & then borrowed to blow more. Almost makes Howard look like he was entitled to a splurge. I don't at all agree with our money being used by pollies to have a good time but to filter out Howard whilst letting Rudd flush through is the height of hypocrisy. Abbott is not using Rudd Government-made money because there isn't any. Posted by individual, Monday, 14 October 2013 6:46:06 PM
| |
Yes, individual....perhaps you'd be so kind as to remind us how many billions of dollars of government assets the Howard govt sold off to "put that money in the coffers"?
Around 70-odd billion dollars worth wasn't it? http://www.marketeconomics.com.au/2095-more-facts-behind-the-howard-governments-debt-elimination Nice to know they earned the right to throw a private toadying party with the proceeds. Posted by Poirot, Monday, 14 October 2013 8:25:59 PM
| |
Around 70-odd billion dollars worth wasn't it?
Poirot, Ok, point taken. Where's that money gone along with the other many billions ? Posted by individual, Monday, 14 October 2013 8:55:45 PM
| |
individual,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_financial_crisis_in_September_2008 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-21/ratings-agencies-affirm-australia-at-aaa/4439802 http://www.smh.com.au/business/sp-affirms-australias-aaa-credit-rating-20130718-2q5yr.html http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2013/002.htm&pageID=003&min=cebb&Year=&DocType= Posted by Poirot, Monday, 14 October 2013 9:28:22 PM
| |
The author is to be applauded for trying to get readers to see the bigger picture.
I wonder if there are any politicians and bureaucrats anywhere with the passion for overseas jaunts of their Australian counterparts? In a previous life with a global providing consultancy services to private companies but also to departments and agencies, it was not unusual to receive calls from our larger offices overseas concerning impending visits by Australian dignitaries, both politicians and bureaucrats. It would go along the lines of: "Who are they and why aren't they phoning the partners in Australia (ie the known contacts and better placed to advise them)?". Just because we were contractors to government in Australia it was imagined that our offices in other countries (the desirable ones for travel visits) would assist in drafting excuses for visits and for providing hospitality and entertainment while the Oz dignitaries where around. Still, one would always like to be polite and respectful, so someone who could be released was designated to show them the sights, which included a briefing on the company and was usually in 'more convenient' hotel conference space. -You just couldn't have visitors expecting to be show-boated around a busy office and interrupting people with deadlines to meet. I know there were some bottom lips because it was always done very efficiently and professionally, but they appreciated the briefing paper on our latest service that they could show back home as evidence of their visit and research. I agree with the author and suggest that the ANAO should be set the task of conducting a comprehensive audit across all departments and agencies, of travel and overseas visits, placements and exchanges. As for the politicians, it appears that they will do what they want to do anyhow. They have more front than a London bus. No review will ever change that, but regularly tipping governments out of office delays some of the worst corruption. It might even remind some that they are supposed to be serving the public. Posted by onthebeach, Tuesday, 15 October 2013 1:31:14 AM
| |
Poirot,
These links are mere excuses for the excesses of the money market. If there were indeed a global financial crisis as such then a hell of a lot of the rich would not be richer now. I'm afraid you're sucked in by their gobbledeegook. What they claim to be a crisis is nothing more than less than hoped for profit. If things were that good under the ALP in Australia then why are Australians selling australian soil ? Is it need or is it greed ? Is it smart economics or utterly dumb ? All the links you provide are always from Economists who always proclaim to have such wonderful insight in hindsight. Why aren't they a step ahead ? Because they're full of crap feeding crap to the gullible. When you have nations where hardly anyone produces anything then you have rorting because it has to be rorting because how else do so many get their hands onto so much money whilst there is supposedly a financial crisis. The only crisis is unfair distribution. Posted by individual, Tuesday, 15 October 2013 6:24:25 AM
| |
Haven't economic forecasters been shown to be rather less accurate than psychics and other shysters?
Posted by Candide, Tuesday, 15 October 2013 7:42:49 AM
|