Now that Alan has been caught telling porkies, his credibility is shot.

Murdoch's voice is one among thousands, it is just one of the most trusted and listened to ones based on years of accurate, articulate and incisive reporting. That a few individuals at one of his many subsidiaries overseas acted unethically in obtaining information does not translate to Australia. Alan and his contemporaries in Getup etc have over egged the cake so many times that most Australians have simply stopped listening.

Alan, if you want to motivate for an "ethical" press you need to try to be ethical yourself.

im..enjoying
not enjoining..the passions..of both sides

if only we heard more to the real topic..
ruperts ABILITY..to spin..sin is in?

anyhow the numbers will reveal./.that words so..affectivly conceal

never the less im learning so much

never the less..post opinions if you got em
judgment day is on..sa-turn-day../..sat-an'day../sit-in-day../..saturday

Yes, only a fool/s could believe that a media baron caused the majority of Aust's to vote one way.

Chris,

I wonder why Uncle Rupert has gone to all the trouble of daubing his front pages with anti-Rudd/Labor rhetoric.

What a silly man if it's had no effect at all.

: )

Quite simple, Poirot. It did not change the US elections, Obama still won, but it made him lots of money! Rupert sells anything from page 3 girls to religious programmes, to make a quid

Yabby,

Awww, c'mon....

Yes Rupert makes money, but he was giving it his best shot to get Romney up.

That it didn't work is beside the point.

Murdoch was using his position and clout the way he knows best.