The Forum > Article Comments > The challenge of budget honesty > Comments
The challenge of budget honesty : Comments
By Andrew Leigh, published 20/8/2013The problem for the Liberals is that they have spent the past three years saying ‘no’ to Labor’s sensible savings measures.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 22 August 2013 9:28:04 AM
| |
I do not know of any Paul Koukouluas and neither does Google. I can’t wind the clock back to August 14 and go to Melbourne and buy an Age. Imajulianutter’s “challenge” to find that nonexistent $100bn debt is another wild goose chase, written in Pidgin, asking a poster to go way beyond the allowed 4 posts, a standard troll stratagem. I provided a link to official data on each year’s total left-over deficit. Look it up. I won’t reply as even this over-the-four post may not make it. Any reader stupid enough to believe the $100bn debt story is welcome.
Posted by EmperorJulian, Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:59:09 AM
| |
here is the original source and it was repeated in koukoulas article in the age.
http://www.percapita.org.au/01_cms/details.asp?ID=628 you are looking sillier all the time emps. Obviously you can not usefully use a comp either. Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 22 August 2013 7:12:39 PM
| |
Hey Emps
Has the cat got your tongue or are you choking on your vegimite sandwich? Posted by imajulianutter, Friday, 23 August 2013 6:10:55 PM
|
Have a read of the Age on 14/8/2013. Particularly read the article by Paul Koukouluas. Not only is he not a Murdoch journo but he was also a senior economic advisor to Labor PM Julia Gillard. Seems he shares my view and actually details the dates of the down paying of Keatings 96 billion debt. Not only that, you'd love him, because he criticises Costello for paying it down AND his method of doing so.
I won't supply the link. You should be interested enough yo correct your own misconceptions and errors. That would stop you making yourself look silly.